Re: incorrect taint of ndiswrapper

[Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>]

On Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 01:36:41AM +0200, Sven-Haegar Koch wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Oct 2006, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> 
> >On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 06:29:53PM -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> >>Anyway, I don't think it's relevant to ndiswrapper.
> >>...
> >
> >All non-GPL'ed modules are in a grey area, and the question isn't
> >whether it's black or white but how light or dark the grey is...
> 
> ndiswrapper is GPL, but is (with the current code) not allowed to use the 
> gpl-only'ed symbols.

ndiswrapper is mostly a compatility layer for linking non-GPL'ed code 
into the kernel.

This is really a grey area, and the legal status might depend on the 
jurisdiction and the judge.

Considering the vivid "cease and desist" business in Germany, I wouldn't 
be surprised if some day someone would start sending "cease and desist" 
letters against mirrors in Germany distributing code in this grey 
area...

> c'ya
> sven

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/