Re: Re: 2.6.18: unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address e5e9ec24

Hi,

On 10/26/06, Martin J. Bligh <[email protected]> wrote:

Binary modules loaded. Don't do that.

To elaborate bit on what Martin said here, there aren't many
developers on LKML that are willing to debug a tainted kernel. Please
reproduce without any binary-only modules and post the results to get
help. Thanks.

                            Pekka
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • 2.6.18: unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address e5e9ec24
    • From: [email protected]
  • Re: 2.6.18: unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address e5e9ec24
    • From: "Martin J. Bligh" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 5/5] Only call rebalance_domains when needed from scheduler_tick
• Next by Date: Re: incorrect taint of ndiswrapper
• Previous by thread: Re: 2.6.18: unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address e5e9ec24
• Next by thread: [PATCH] strstrip remove last blank fix
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]