Re: [PATCH 1/1] fat: improve sync performance by grouping writes in fat_mirror_bhs [really unmangled]

Holden Karau wrote:

From: Holden Karau <[email protected]> http://www.holdenkarau.com

This is an attempt at improving fat_mirror_bhs in sync mode [namely it
writes all of the data for a backup block, and then blocks untill
finished]. The old behaviour would write & block in smaller chunks, so
this should be slightly faster. It also removes the fixme requesting
that it be fixed to behave this way :-)
Signed-off-by: Holden Karau <[email protected]> http://www.holdenkarau.com

So how much is performance improved?

--
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.

Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com -

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH 1/1] fat: improve sync performance by grouping writes in fat_mirror_bhs [really unmangled]
    • From: "Holden Karau" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH 1/1] fat: improve sync performance by grouping writes in fat_mirror_bhs [really unmangled]
    • From: Holden Karau <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 5/5] Only call rebalance_domains when needed from scheduler_tick
• Next by Date: Re: 2.6.18 kernel panic on boot with VIA power-off quirk.
• Previous by thread: [PATCH 1/1] fat: improve sync performance by grouping writes in fat_mirror_bhs [really unmangled]
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/1] fat: improve sync performance by grouping writes in fat_mirror_bhs [really unmangled]
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]