Re: Another kernel releated GPL ?

On 10/26/06, Mark Hounschell <[email protected]> wrote:

I'm sure every lawyer will have his own opinion. In the end won't it come down
to the intent of the kernel developer? Surly the definition of "derivative work"
has to be, or has been already, defined by someone other than a lawyer or court
that knows nothing of "kernel development"?

Please, consult a lawyer for legal advice, not the LKML.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Another kernel releated GPL ?
    • From: Mark Hounschell <[email protected]>
  • Re: Another kernel releated GPL ?
    • From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
  • Re: Another kernel releated GPL ?
    • From: Mark Hounschell <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Security issues with local filesystem caching
• Next by Date: [PATCH 1/1] fat: improve sync performance by grouping writes in fat_mirror_bhs [really unmangled]
• Previous by thread: Re: Another kernel releated GPL ?
• Next by thread: Re: Another kernel releated GPL ?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]