Re: Incorrect order of last two arguments of ptrace for requests PPC_PTRACE_GETREGS, SETREGS, GETFPREGS, SETFPREGS

From: supriya kannery <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 16:23:14 +0530

> If we exchange the last two arguments like,
> 
>  ptrace (PPC_PTRACE_GETREGS, pid, &reg[0], 0);
> 
> it works!

Please make sure that programs, such as gdb, aren't using the reversed
argument order.  If they are, you cannot "fix" this as it will break
all such applictions.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Incorrect order of last two arguments of ptrace for requests PPC_PTRACE_GETREGS, SETREGS, GETFPREGS, SETFPREGS
  - From: supriya kannery <[email protected]>

References:
- Incorrect order of last two arguments of ptrace for requests PPC_PTRACE_GETREGS, SETREGS, GETFPREGS, SETFPREGS
  - From: supriya kannery <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: Frustrated with Linux, Asus, and nVidia, and AMD
Next by Date: Re: Behaviour of compat_msgsnd/compat_msgrcv calls
Previous by thread: Incorrect order of last two arguments of ptrace for requests PPC_PTRACE_GETREGS, SETREGS, GETFPREGS, SETFPREGS
Next by thread: Re: Incorrect order of last two arguments of ptrace for requests PPC_PTRACE_GETREGS, SETREGS, GETFPREGS, SETFPREGS
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]