David Howells wrote:
> Vasily Averin <[email protected]> wrote:
>> The patch adds this dentry into tail of the dentry_unused list.
>
> I think that's reasonable. I wonder if we can avoid removing it from the list
> in the first place, but I suspect it's less optimal.
Could you please explain this place in details, I do not understand why tail of
the list is better than head.
Also I do not understand why we should go to out in this case. Why we cannot use
next dentry in the list instead?
> Acked-By: David Howells <[email protected]>
Thank you,
Vasily Averin
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
