On Wed 2006-10-25 18:38:30, David Chinner wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 10:10:01AM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > Hence the only way to correctly rebuild the XFS state on resume is
> > > to quiesce the filesystem on suspend and thaw it on resume so as to
> > > trigger log recovery.
> >
> > No, during suspend/resume, memory image is saved, and no state is
> > lost. We would not even have to do sys_sync(), and suspend/resume
> > would still work properly.
>
> It seems to me that you ensure the filesystem is synced to disk and
> then at some point later you record the memory state of the
> filesystem, but these happen at different times. That leaves a
> window for things to get out of sync again, right?
I DO NOT HAVE TO ENSURE FILESYSTEM IS SYNCED. That sys_sync() is
optional.
Recording of memory state is atomic, and as long as noone writes to
the disk after atomic snapshot, memory image matches what is on disk.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
