Re: [PATCH] x86_64 irq: reset more to default when clear irq_vector for destroy_irq

Andi,

This could get into your tree.

YH

On 10/24/06, Yinghai Lu <[email protected]> wrote:

resend with gmail.

Clear the irq releated entries in irq_vector, irq_domain and vector_irq
instead of clearing irq_vector only. So when new irq is created, it
could reuse that vector. (actually is the second loop scanning from
FIRST_DEVICE_VECTOR+8). This could avoid the vectors are used up
with enough module inserting and removing

Cc: Eric W. Biedierman <[email protected]>
Signed-off-By: Yinghai Lu <[email protected]>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [PATCH] x86_64 irq: reset more to default when clear irq_vector for destroy_irq
  - From: "Lu, Yinghai" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] x86_64 irq: reset more to default when clear irq_vector for destroy_irq
  - From: "Yinghai Lu" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] x86_64 irq: reuse vector for __assign_irq_vector
Next by Date: Re: PROBLEM: Oops when doing disk heavy disk I/O
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] x86_64 irq: reset more to default when clear irq_vector for destroy_irq
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] x86_64 irq: reset more to default when clear irq_vector for destroy_irq
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]