Re: [PATCH] x86_64 irq: reset more to default when clear irq_vector for destroy_irq

On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 02:33:08PM -0700, Lu, Yinghai wrote:
>  
> Clear the irq releated entries in irq_vector, irq_domain and vector_irq 
> instead of clearing irq_vector only. So when new irq is created, it 
> could get that vector.
> 
> Signed-off-By: Yinghai Lu <[email protected]>
> 
> --- linux-2.6/arch/x86_64/kernel/io_apic.c	2006-10-24
> 13:40:48.000000000 -0700
> +++ linux-2.6.xx/arch/x86_64/kernel/io_apic.c	2006-10-24
> 14:03:08.000000000 -0700
> @@ -716,6 +716,22 @@

Your patch got mangled up.

Josef "Jeff" Sipek.

-- 
Linux, n.:
  Generous programmers from around the world all join forces to help
  you shoot yourself in the foot for free. 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH] x86_64 irq: reset more to default when clear irq_vector for destroy_irq
    • From: "Lu, Yinghai" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [Patch 0/5] I/O statistics through request queues
• Next by Date: Re: [openib-general] Ordering between PCI config space writes and MMIO reads?
• Previous by thread: [PATCH] x86_64 irq: reset more to default when clear irq_vector for destroy_irq
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] x86_64 irq: reset more to default when clear irq_vector for destroy_irq
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]