On Tue, 2006-24-10 at 21:07 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 24 October 2006 20:42, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> > On 10/24/06, Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > spu_acquire(ctx);
> > > - for (count = 0; count <= len; count += 4, udata++) {
> > > + for (count = 0; (count + 4) <= len; count += 4, udata++) {
> >
> > Wouldn't this be more obvious as
> >
> > for (count = 0, count < (len / 4); count++, udata++) {
> >
> > And then do count * 4 if you need the actual index somewhere. Hmm?
>
> Count is the return value from a write() file operation. I find it
> more readable to update that every time I do one put_user(), to
> the exact value, than calculating the return code later.
Hey Arnd,
just curiosity.. What was the behavior before this patch? just
leaving a few (0 - 3) characters behind?
>
> Arnd <><
> _______________________________________________
> Linuxppc-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
