Re: Battery class driver.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2006-10-24 at 04:53 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 01:48:27PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > On Tue, 2006-10-24 at 04:27 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> 
> > > Reading the battery status has the potential to call an SMI that might 
> > > take an arbitrary period of time to return, and we found that having 
> > > querying at around the 1 second mark tended to result in noticable 
> > > system performace degredation.
> 
> > I think it's up to the backend to poll more slowly and cache the results
> > on those machines then.
> 
> The kernel backend or the userspace backend? We need to decide on 
> terminology :) 

The kernel. Userspace don't have to know the details of how hard it is
for the backend to fetch the data imho.

> There's no good programmatic way of determining how long 
> a query will take other than doing it and looking at the result. I guess 
> we could do that at boot time.

Ben.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux