Re: Battery class driver.

> The tp_smapi code also provides average current and power, the charge 
> cycle count, the date of first use, the date of manufacture and controls 
> for altering the charge behaviour of the battery. Are these things that 
> should go in the generic class?

Also, should we create files for things that the backend doesn't
provide ? Seems like a waste of memory to me.

Ben


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Battery class driver.
    • From: David Woodhouse <[email protected]>
  • Re: Battery class driver.
    • From: Matthew Garrett <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [KJ][PATCH] Correct misc_register return code handling in several drivers
• Next by Date: Re: Battery class driver.
• Previous by thread: Re: Battery class driver.
• Next by thread: Re: Battery class driver.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]