On Sun, 22 Oct 2006, Paul Jackson wrote: > I believe that Christoph is actively working that problem. Adding him > to the cc list, so he can explain the state of this work more > accurately. That issue was fixed by retrying load balancing without the cpu that has all processes pinned. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [RFC] cpuset: remove sched domain hooks from cpusets
- From: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
- Re: [RFC] cpuset: remove sched domain hooks from cpusets
- From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
- Re: [RFC] cpuset: remove sched domain hooks from cpusets
- From: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
- Re: [RFC] cpuset: remove sched domain hooks from cpusets
- From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
- Re: [RFC] cpuset: remove sched domain hooks from cpusets
- From: Martin Bligh <mbligh@google.com>
- Re: [RFC] cpuset: remove sched domain hooks from cpusets
- From: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
- Re: [RFC] cpuset: remove sched domain hooks from cpusets
- From: "Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
- Re: [RFC] cpuset: remove sched domain hooks from cpusets
- From: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
- [RFC] cpuset: remove sched domain hooks from cpusets
- Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.19-rc2: ieee80211/ipw2200 regression
- Next by Date: Re: 2.6.19-rc2: ieee80211/ipw2200 regression
- Previous by thread: Re: [RFC] cpuset: remove sched domain hooks from cpusets
- Next by thread: [RFC] cpuset: add interface to isolated cpus
- Index(es):
![]() |