Re: [RFC] cpuset: remove sched domain hooks from cpusets

On Sun, 22 Oct 2006, Paul Jackson wrote:

> I believe that Christoph is actively working that problem.  Adding him
> to the cc list, so he can explain the state of this work more
> accurately.

That issue was fixed by retrying load balancing without the cpu that has 
all processes pinned.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [RFC] cpuset: remove sched domain hooks from cpusets
    • From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC] cpuset: remove sched domain hooks from cpusets
    • From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC] cpuset: remove sched domain hooks from cpusets
    • From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC] cpuset: remove sched domain hooks from cpusets
    • From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC] cpuset: remove sched domain hooks from cpusets
    • From: Martin Bligh <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC] cpuset: remove sched domain hooks from cpusets
    • From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC] cpuset: remove sched domain hooks from cpusets
    • From: "Siddha, Suresh B" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC] cpuset: remove sched domain hooks from cpusets
    • From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.19-rc2: ieee80211/ipw2200 regression
• Next by Date: Re: 2.6.19-rc2: ieee80211/ipw2200 regression
• Previous by thread: Re: [RFC] cpuset: remove sched domain hooks from cpusets
• Next by thread: [RFC] cpuset: add interface to isolated cpus
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]