--- Chase Venters <[email protected]> wrote:
> Next question - what version of ndiswrapper started voluntary tainting (or
> has
> it always?)
>
> That is to say, are there versions of ndiswrapper floating around out there
> in
> the ether capable of building against 2.6.19-rc* that don't voluntarily
> add_taint()? (I'm guessing the answer is 'no', but the answer is possibly
> important to consider)
Since version 1.0, ndiswrapper has been tainting kernel when a driver is
loaded. Version 1.0 is quite old (circa Jan 2005) and won't build with any
recent kernels.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
