Dinakar wrote:
> IMO this patch addresses just one of the requirements for partitionable
> sched domains
Correct - this particular patch was just addressing one of these.
Nick raised the reasonable concern that this patch was adding something
to cpusets that was not especially related to cpusets.
So I will not be sending this patch to Andrew for *-mm.
There are further opportunities for improvements in some of this code,
which my colleague Christoph Lameter may be taking an interest in.
Ideally kernel-user API's for isolating and partitioning sched domains
would arise from that work, though I don't know if we can wait that
long.
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <[email protected]> 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
