Re: dealing with excessive includes

> This needs annotations to fix, or a big bag of unreliable heuristics.

Ok you're right that case would need annotations.

I retreat my earlier statement that self sufficient include files
are a good idea.  If it needs such hacks to do it it's probably not worth
it. After all it won't fix a single bug.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: dealing with excessive includes
  - From: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]>

References:
- Re: dealing with excessive includes
  - From: Alexey Dobriyan <[email protected]>
- Re: dealing with excessive includes
  - From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: dealing with excessive includes
  - From: Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: dealing with excessive includes
Next by Date: 2.6.19-rc2: ieee80211/ipw2200 regression
Previous by thread: Re: dealing with excessive includes
Next by thread: Re: dealing with excessive includes
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]