Re: [PATCH 0/7] KVM: Kernel-based Virtual Machine

• To: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] KVM: Kernel-based Virtual Machine
• From: Roland Dreier <[email protected]>
• Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 17:27:45 -0700
• Authentication-results: sj-dkim-1.cisco.com; [email protected]; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com verified; );
• Cc: Alan Cox <[email protected]>, Avi Kivity <[email protected]>, Muli Ben-Yehuda <[email protected]>, linux-kernel <[email protected]>, Anthony Liguori <[email protected]>
• Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; l=392; t=1161563267; x=1162427267; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim1002; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; [email protected]; z=From:Roland=20Dreier=20<[email protected]> |Subject:Re=3A=20[PATCH=200/7]=20KVM=3A=20Kernel-based=20Virtual=20Machine; X=v=3Dcisco.com=3B=20h=3DT1dZ/5f9SvzE+kQwne2/9Ne2EI4=3D; b=g/L1MZTywFYymOhsptB/3kJOVWLDNqYJI7v2pFkG08AaOK9AlqmAXpkuevDk2rCjORyk1+gK h09x5CAzc1dyWWl8HVquDf/JpOqEJJslPgLJz6XT0xTlaPWwr1YC1Nek;
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]> (Andi Kleen's message of "23 Oct 2006 00:28:58 +0200")
• References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
• Sender: [email protected]
• User-agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) XEmacs/21.4.18 (linux)

 > Ah you're right. I forgot about the Yonahs. The number is probably
 > not even that small (when Intel ships something x86 they tend to 
 > do it in millions)

Right, it's quite a mainstream CPU -- for example every current
Thinkpad has one I think.  And lots of kernel hackers tend to care
about making things work on a Thinkpad (except for akpm and his
precious vaio :).

 - R.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH 0/7] KVM: Kernel-based Virtual Machine
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH 0/7] KVM: Kernel-based Virtual Machine
    • From: Avi Kivity <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 0/7] KVM: Kernel-based Virtual Machine
    • From: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 0/7] KVM: Kernel-based Virtual Machine
    • From: Avi Kivity <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 0/7] KVM: Kernel-based Virtual Machine
    • From: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 0/7] KVM: Kernel-based Virtual Machine
    • From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 0/7] KVM: Kernel-based Virtual Machine
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: NAT failure with TCP, too
• Next by Date: Re: Hopefully, kmalloc() will always succeed, but if it doesn't then....
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/7] KVM: Kernel-based Virtual Machine
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/7] KVM: Kernel-based Virtual Machine
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]