On Sunday, 22 October 2006 20:39, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 14:29:33 +0200
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Sunday, 22 October 2006 14:14, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> > > Hi guys.
> > >
> > > I missed a couple of "#include <freezer.h>"s in yesterdays patch;
> > > funnily enough the ones in kernel/power! Here's an updated version.
> > >
> > > Rafael, did you still think the freezer.h contents should go into
> > > suspend.h?
> >
> > Yes.
> >
>
> I think freezer.h is OK. One 84-line file which does one thing is nice.
> There's little advantage to putting this code into suspend.h along with a
> bunch of somewhat-unrelated stuff.
All of this stuff has one thing in common: it is only used for suspend
(to disk or to RAM) now.
> And it expresses the point that the freezer could be used for things other
> than suspend.
Okay, then. Let's take the patch as is.
--
You never change things by fighting the existing reality.
R. Buckminster Fuller
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
