Re: Freezer.h updated patch.

["Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>]

On Sunday, 22 October 2006 20:39, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 14:29:33 +0200
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > On Sunday, 22 October 2006 14:14, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> > > Hi guys.
> > > 
> > > I missed a couple of "#include <freezer.h>"s in yesterdays patch;
> > > funnily enough the ones in kernel/power! Here's an updated version.
> > > 
> > > Rafael, did you still think the freezer.h contents should go into
> > > suspend.h?
> > 
> > Yes.
> > 
> 
> I think freezer.h is OK.  One 84-line file which does one thing is nice. 
> There's little advantage to putting this code into suspend.h along with a
> bunch of somewhat-unrelated stuff.

All of this stuff has one thing in common: it is only used for suspend
(to disk or to RAM) now.

> And it expresses the point that the freezer could be used for things other
> than suspend.  

Okay, then.  Let's take the patch as is.


-- 
You never change things by fighting the existing reality.
		R. Buckminster Fuller
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/