On 10/22/06, Muli Ben-Yehuda <[email protected]> wrote:
All of the tests I ran were with NR_CPUS=8. Shall I try NR_CPUS=4?
So per_cpu only can be used onlined cpus? I wonder if you try NR_CPUS without the patch, you will get more strange result. YH - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: [PATCH] x86-64: typo in __assign_irq_vector when updating pos for vector and offset
- From: Muli Ben-Yehuda <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] x86-64: typo in __assign_irq_vector when updating pos for vector and offset
- From: "Yinghai Lu" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] x86-64: typo in __assign_irq_vector when updating pos for vector and offset
- From: Muli Ben-Yehuda <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] x86-64: typo in __assign_irq_vector when updating pos for vector and offset
- From: yhlu <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] x86-64: typo in __assign_irq_vector when updating pos for vector and offset
- From: Muli Ben-Yehuda <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] x86-64: typo in __assign_irq_vector when updating pos for vector and offset
- Prev by Date: Re: tg3 kernel bug in 2.6.18-mm3 and 2.6.19-rc2-mm2
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] x86-64: typo in __assign_irq_vector when updating pos for vector and offset
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] x86-64: typo in __assign_irq_vector when updating pos for vector and offset
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] x86-64: typo in __assign_irq_vector when updating pos for vector and offset
- Index(es):
 |