[PATCH] [1/2] x86_64: Fix C3 timer test

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



There was a typo in the C3 latency test to decide of the TSC
should be used or not. It used the C2 latency threshold, not the
C3 one. Fix that.

This should fix the time on various dual core laptops.

Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>

---
 arch/x86_64/kernel/time.c |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Index: linux/arch/x86_64/kernel/time.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/arch/x86_64/kernel/time.c
+++ linux/arch/x86_64/kernel/time.c
@@ -948,7 +948,7 @@ __cpuinit int unsynchronized_tsc(void)
  	if (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_INTEL) {
 #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
 		/* But TSC doesn't tick in C3 so don't use it there */
-		if (acpi_fadt.length > 0 && acpi_fadt.plvl3_lat < 100)
+		if (acpi_fadt.length > 0 && acpi_fadt.plvl3_lat < 1000)
 			return 1;
 #endif
  		return 0;
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux