Re: [PATCH] more helpful WARN_ON and BUG_ON messages

[Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>]

On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 04:56:37PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> Adrian Bunk wrote:
> 
> > Who really needs this considering it implies a size increase of the 
> > kernel image?
> > 
> > Using a kernel tree so unusual that you can't locate the source anymore 
> > sounds like an extremely rare and unintelligent situation, not something 
> > that must be handled.
> 
> Most debugging code makes the kernel bigger, slower... and easier to
> debug, no?
> 
> It's not a question of not being -able- to locate sources; it's a
> question of being able to look at a bug report and triage it quickly
> without digging around to find the kernel du jour that produced it.  *shrug*

It's not that BUGs were that frequent.

And with your suggestion "I suppose this could be put under CONFIG_DEBUG", 
it would anyway be turned off by nearly everyone.

> -Eric

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/