On Fri, 20 Oct 2006, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 20 October 2006 15:54, Dwayne Grant McConnell wrote:
> > I think %0xllx is the way to go. I would even advocate changing
> > signal1_type and signal2_type unless it is actually too dangerous.
>
> There is absolutely no reason why these should be hexadecimal, they
> are basically implementing a bool.
>
> > Is there even a case where changing from %llu to %0xllx would break things?
> > Perhaps with the combination of a old library with a new kernel?
>
> Right, a library or some script that has been written assuming there
> is no leading 0x.
Okay. Thanks for considering it. I'll leave the %llu as is.
--
Dwayne Grant McConnell <[email protected]>
Lotus Notes Mail: Dwayne McConnell [Mail]/Austin/IBM@IBMUS
Lotus Notes Calendar: Dwayne McConnell [Calendar]/Austin/IBM@IBMUS
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
