On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 02:11:45PM +0200, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 08:12:34AM +0200, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> >Hello,
...
Very sorry - one more fix!
Here are mainly some lockdep returns with 0 with unlocking fixes.
Best regards and cheers,
Jarek P.
PS: I'll be back on monday.
Signed-off-by: Jarek Poplawski <[email protected]>
---
diff -Nurp linux-2.6.19-rc2-git3-/kernel/lockdep.c linux-2.6.19-rc2-git3/kernel/lockdep.c
--- linux-2.6.19-rc2-git3-/kernel/lockdep.c 2006-10-19 18:41:00.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.19-rc2-git3/kernel/lockdep.c 2006-10-20 14:58:21.000000000 +0200
@@ -227,9 +227,9 @@ static int save_trace(struct stack_trace
trace->skip = 3;
trace->all_contexts = 0;
-
- /* Make sure to not recurse in case the the unwinder needs to tak
-e locks. */
+ /*
+ * Make sure to not recurse in case the unwinder needs to take locks.
+ */
lockdep_off();
save_stack_trace(trace, NULL);
lockdep_on();
@@ -237,8 +237,10 @@ e locks. */
trace->max_entries = trace->nr_entries;
nr_stack_trace_entries += trace->nr_entries;
- if (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(nr_stack_trace_entries > MAX_STACK_TRACE_ENTRIES))
+ if (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(nr_stack_trace_entries > MAX_STACK_TRACE_ENTRIES)) {
+ __raw_spin_unlock(&hash_lock);
return 0;
+ }
if (nr_stack_trace_entries == MAX_STACK_TRACE_ENTRIES) {
__raw_spin_unlock(&hash_lock);
@@ -474,7 +476,8 @@ static int add_lock_to_list(struct lock_
return 0;
entry->class = this;
- save_trace(&entry->trace);
+ if (!save_trace(&entry->trace))
+ return 0;
/*
* Since we never remove from the dependency list, the list can
@@ -562,8 +565,12 @@ static noinline int print_circular_bug_t
if (debug_locks_silent)
return 0;
+ /* hash_lock unlocked by the header */
+ __raw_spin_lock(&hash_lock);
this.class = check_source->class;
- save_trace(&this.trace);
+ if (!save_trace(&this.trace))
+ return 0;
+ __raw_spin_unlock(&hash_lock);
print_circular_bug_entry(&this, 0);
printk("\nother info that might help us debug this:\n\n");
@@ -959,6 +966,9 @@ check_prev_add(struct task_struct *curr,
}
/*
+ * Return value of 2 signals 'dependency already added',
+ * in that case we dont have to add the backlink either.
+ *
* Ok, all validations passed, add the new lock
* to the previous lock's dependency list:
*/
@@ -966,15 +976,10 @@ check_prev_add(struct task_struct *curr,
&prev->class->locks_after, next->acquire_ip);
if (!ret)
return 0;
- /*
- * Return value of 2 signals 'dependency already added',
- * in that case we dont have to add the backlink either.
- */
- if (ret == 2)
- return 2;
ret = add_lock_to_list(next->class, prev->class,
&next->class->locks_before, next->acquire_ip);
-
+ if (!ret)
+ return 0;
/*
* Debugging printouts:
*/
@@ -1025,7 +1030,8 @@ check_prevs_add(struct task_struct *curr
* added:
*/
if (hlock->read != 2) {
- check_prev_add(curr, hlock, next);
+ if (!check_prev_add(curr, hlock, next))
+ return 0;
/*
* Stop after the first non-trylock entry,
* as non-trylock entries have added their
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
