Re: dealing with excessive includes

On Wednesday 18 October 2006 18:32, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> I think ext2 was already fixed to use its own spinlocks for bitmap
> accesses, although it looks like somebody re-introduced "lock_super()"
> there for xattr handling.

I'll send a cleanup patch for that.

Thanks,
Andreas
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [RFC] typechecking for get_unaligned/put_unaligned
  - From: Al Viro <[email protected]>
- Re: dealing with excessive includes
  - From: Al Viro <[email protected]>
- Re: dealing with excessive includes
  - From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: Linux ISO-9660 Rock Ridge bug needs fix
Next by Date: [PATCH 2/7] Char: isicom, rename init function
Previous by thread: Re: dealing with excessive includes
Next by thread: Re: dealing with excessive includes
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]