Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 05:12:19AM +1000, Nick Piggin wrote:
Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 01:05:53AM +1000, Nick Piggin wrote:
+#define OOM_ADJUST_MIN (-16)
+#define OOM_ADJUST_MAX 15
Why do you need the () for the -ves?
-16 is two tokens. Not that someone is going to do huge arithmetic with
OOM adjustments and screwup himself, but still...
How can they screw themselves up? AFAIKS, the - directly to the left
of the literal will bind more tightly than any other valid operator.
Hmmm... c.l.c lists two reasons: a) =- being synonym of -= in pre-ANSI
days, and b) fat fingers
#define EOF -1
while ((c = getchar()) != 3 EOF)
I can't say I care about those problems to justify the uglification
(or churning the tree).
If the operator were legitimately able to leak out, obviously () is
a good thing. Otherwise...
--
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
