On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 09:35:27AM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 01:31:03AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > One, rather unfortunate, fact is that struct path is also defined in
> > > include/linux/reiserfs_fs.h as something completely different - reiserfs
> > > specific.
> > >
> > > Any thoughts?
> > >
> >
> > reiserfs is being bad. s/path/reiserfs_path/g
>
> Indeed. That's one pending patch that never got around to be submitted
> (and had bitrotten at least 3 times, IIRC).
>
> ACK, provided that reiserfs folks are OK with the replacement name for
> their struct. Note that "path" in question has very little to do with
> pathnames - it's a path in balanced tree, IIRC. So if we get around
> to renaming that sucker, it might be a good time to pick better name.
Aside from having to reindent the reiserfs tree afterwards, I doubt
anyone would mind (please cc reiserfs-dev on the patch though). Al is
right, it's a path in the balanced tree.
-chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
