On Tue, 2006-10-17 at 13:40 -0400, Ryan Richter wrote:
> So do I want something like
>
>
> static int do_validate_cmd(int cmd)
> {
> return 1;
> }
>
> in i915_dma.c?
that will certainly avoid any checks. Another alternative is to printk
the cmd which fails validation so we can see what needs adding here.
--
[email protected]
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Intel 965G: i915_dispatch_cmdbuffer failed (2.6.19-rc2)
- From: Keith Whitwell <[email protected]>
- Re: Intel 965G: i915_dispatch_cmdbuffer failed (2.6.19-rc2)
- From: Ryan Richter <[email protected]>
- Re: Intel 965G: i915_dispatch_cmdbuffer failed (2.6.19-rc2)
- References:
- Intel 965G: i915_dispatch_cmdbuffer failed (2.6.19-rc2)
- From: Ryan Richter <[email protected]>
- Re: Intel 965G: i915_dispatch_cmdbuffer failed (2.6.19-rc2)
- From: Keith Packard <[email protected]>
- Re: Intel 965G: i915_dispatch_cmdbuffer failed (2.6.19-rc2)
- From: Ryan Richter <[email protected]>
- Intel 965G: i915_dispatch_cmdbuffer failed (2.6.19-rc2)
- Prev by Date: [PATCH 3/4] Add "void conf_set_changed_callback(void (*fn)(void))", use it in qconf.cc
- Next by Date: [PATCH 4/4] Set gconf's save-widget's sensitivity according to .config's changed state
- Previous by thread: Re: Intel 965G: i915_dispatch_cmdbuffer failed (2.6.19-rc2)
- Next by thread: Re: Intel 965G: i915_dispatch_cmdbuffer failed (2.6.19-rc2)
- Index(es):
 |