Re: Machine restart doesn't work - Intel 965G, 2.6.19-rc2 / e1000?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Aleksey Gorelov wrote:

--- Ryan Richter <[email protected]> wrote:
2.6.19-rc1-git9 doesn't work any better for me.  I haven't tried
unloading the e1000 module yet.  Since I run the machine off an nfsroot,
it will require some creativity to test that.

-ryan

You may try the following patch instead if it's easier for you. It'll likely break suspend stuff,
but you won't need to play around with modules.

Aleks.

--- linux-2.6.19-rc2/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c.orig	2006-10-17 13:36:06.000000000 -0700
+++ linux-2.6.19-rc2/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c	2006-10-17 13:36:50.000000000 -0700
@@ -4847,6 +4847,7 @@
 static void e1000_shutdown(struct pci_dev *pdev)
 {
 	e1000_suspend(pdev, PMSG_SUSPEND);
+	pci_set_power_state(pdev, PCI_D0);
 }
#ifdef CONFIG_NET_POLL_CONTROLLER

I wouldn't do that like this, since e1000_suspend already does a pci_set_power_state() right before it exits, and doing two of those closely after another might result in an undetermined state.

I would be more interested in forcing D3 state instead of the current `pci_set_power_state(pdev, pci_choose_state(pdev, state));` in e1000_suspend, so can you try this instead?

diff --git a/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c b/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c
index ce0d35f..30ceeec 100644
--- a/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c
@@ -4793,7 +4793,7 @@ #endif

        pci_disable_device(pdev);

-       pci_set_power_state(pdev, pci_choose_state(pdev, state));
+       pci_set_power_state(pdev, PCI_D3hot);

        return 0;
 }


alternatively, you can try PCI_D3cold or PCI_D0, but setting the device to D0 is a no-op: the device is already in D0 at run-time, so that's silly.

In any case: this is not a driver bug, but really (unfortunately) a platform issue, so this fix is not suitable for general cases *at all*, and we'd have to validate this nasty workaround on all other chipsets that e1000 supports too, something that ain't going to happen I'm sure.

constructive: I've just spend some time working with e100+suspend+shutdown+netconsole, so I'll audit e1000 for that in the next few weeks and make sure that all works properly. Perhaps that yields something for you.

Cheers,

Auke
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux