RE: [PATCH] x86_64: store Socket ID in phys_proc_id

From: Andi Kleen [mailto:[email protected]] 

>> Socket ID is 0 for first Physical processor?
>It must just be some unique ID for each socket.

For dual core, if I lift AP's APIC ID and no touch BSP's APIC ID.
For example, BSP is still 0, and second core is 0x11.
The phys_proc_id will be 0 for BSP, and 8 for second core.
So I suggest you to use initial APIC ID to get socket id instead of APIC
ID.

YH


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] x86_64: store Socket ID in phys_proc_id
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [RFC: 2.6.19 patch] snd-hda-intel: default MSI to off
• Next by Date: Re: [patch -mm 2/7] rename struct namespace to struct mnt_namespace
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] x86_64: store Socket ID in phys_proc_id
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] x86_64: store Socket ID in phys_proc_id
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]