Mark> I was thinking more about the non wordsized fields, such as
Mark> the various u8 bytes that gcc will lay out differently
Mark> depending upon endianess.
I don't know of any gcc version that changes the order of struct
fields. You might be thinking of bitfields, which are laid out in an
endian-dependent way.
- R.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] sata_nv ADMA/NCQ support for nForce4
- From: Mark Lord <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] sata_nv ADMA/NCQ support for nForce4
- References:
- RE: [RFC PATCH] nForce4 ADMA with NCQ: It's aliiiive..
- From: "Allen Martin" <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC PATCH] nForce4 ADMA with NCQ: It's aliiiive..
- From: Robert Hancock <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC PATCH] nForce4 ADMA with NCQ: It's aliiiive..
- From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC PATCH] nForce4 ADMA with NCQ: It's aliiiive..
- From: Robert Hancock <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC PATCH] nForce4 ADMA with NCQ: It's aliiiive..
- From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] sata_nv ADMA/NCQ support for nForce4
- From: Robert Hancock <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] sata_nv ADMA/NCQ support for nForce4
- From: Mark Lord <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] sata_nv ADMA/NCQ support for nForce4
- From: Robert Hancock <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] sata_nv ADMA/NCQ support for nForce4
- From: Mark Lord <[email protected]>
- RE: [RFC PATCH] nForce4 ADMA with NCQ: It's aliiiive..
- Prev by Date: Re: Fwd: [PATCH] x86_64: typo in __assign_irq_vector when update pos for vector and offset
- Next by Date: Re: Machine restart doesn't work - Intel 965G, 2.6.19-rc2
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] sata_nv ADMA/NCQ support for nForce4
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] sata_nv ADMA/NCQ support for nForce4
- Index(es):
 |