Re: [PATCH] sata_nv ADMA/NCQ support for nForce4

• To: Mark Lord <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: [PATCH] sata_nv ADMA/NCQ support for nForce4
• From: Roland Dreier <[email protected]>
• Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 10:58:34 -0700
• Authentication-results: sj-dkim-3.cisco.com; [email protected]; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com verified; );
• Cc: Robert Hancock <[email protected]>, Jens Axboe <[email protected]>, Allen Martin <[email protected]>, Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>, linux-kernel <[email protected]>, [email protected], [email protected]
• Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; l=345; t=1161107917; x=1161971917; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim3002; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; [email protected]; z=From:Roland=20Dreier=20<[email protected]> |Subject:Re=3A=20[PATCH]=20sata_nv=20ADMA/NCQ=20support=20for=20nForce4; X=v=3Dcisco.com=3B=20h=3DuL+A3MEOaSbLy602Yt1VgWbt7x0=3D; b=rbSDsCkwaQCq2gzpcgXWcIgc0KhB4/Ixn01a5I023JW5VHWNu8nRaOBv0JzVhdiVPJih9wPy PxKqnx8JoLGkvASvz6UX2tRWEM4gw/xoIyLwgFhDoTCbbK2zLzloD8q4;
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]> (Mark Lord's message of "Tue, 17 Oct 2006 12:22:07 -0400")
• References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
• Sender: [email protected]
• User-agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) XEmacs/21.4.18 (linux)

    Mark> I was thinking more about the non wordsized fields, such as
    Mark> the various u8 bytes that gcc will lay out differently
    Mark> depending upon endianess.

I don't know of any gcc version that changes the order of struct
fields.  You might be thinking of bitfields, which are laid out in an
endian-dependent way.

 - R.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] sata_nv ADMA/NCQ support for nForce4
    • From: Mark Lord <[email protected]>

• References:
  • RE: [RFC PATCH] nForce4 ADMA with NCQ: It's aliiiive..
    • From: "Allen Martin" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC PATCH] nForce4 ADMA with NCQ: It's aliiiive..
    • From: Robert Hancock <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC PATCH] nForce4 ADMA with NCQ: It's aliiiive..
    • From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC PATCH] nForce4 ADMA with NCQ: It's aliiiive..
    • From: Robert Hancock <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC PATCH] nForce4 ADMA with NCQ: It's aliiiive..
    • From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH] sata_nv ADMA/NCQ support for nForce4
    • From: Robert Hancock <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] sata_nv ADMA/NCQ support for nForce4
    • From: Mark Lord <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] sata_nv ADMA/NCQ support for nForce4
    • From: Robert Hancock <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] sata_nv ADMA/NCQ support for nForce4
    • From: Mark Lord <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Fwd: [PATCH] x86_64: typo in __assign_irq_vector when update pos for vector and offset
• Next by Date: Re: Machine restart doesn't work - Intel 965G, 2.6.19-rc2
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] sata_nv ADMA/NCQ support for nForce4
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] sata_nv ADMA/NCQ support for nForce4
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]