Re: [PATCH] Use min of two prio settings in calculating distress for reclaim

On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 16:33:53 +1000
Nick Piggin <[email protected]> wrote:

> And what have you done to akpm? ;)

I'm sulking.  Would prefer to bitbucket the whole ->prev_priority thing
and do something better, but I haven't got around to thinking about it yet.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [PATCH] Use min of two prio settings in calculating distress for reclaim
  - From: Martin Bligh <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Use min of two prio settings in calculating distress for reclaim
  - From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: linux-2.6-watchdog-mm tree info
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Use min of two prio settings in calculating distress for reclaim
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Use min of two prio settings in calculating distress for reclaim
Next by thread: MP-BIOS bug: 8254 timer not connected to IO-APIC
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]