Re: [PATCH] Use min of two prio settings in calculating distress for reclaim

On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 16:33:53 +1000
Nick Piggin <[email protected]> wrote:

> And what have you done to akpm? ;)

I'm sulking.  Would prefer to bitbucket the whole ->prev_priority thing
and do something better, but I haven't got around to thinking about it yet.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH] Use min of two prio settings in calculating distress for reclaim
    • From: Martin Bligh <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Use min of two prio settings in calculating distress for reclaim
    • From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: linux-2.6-watchdog-mm tree info
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Use min of two prio settings in calculating distress for reclaim
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Use min of two prio settings in calculating distress for reclaim
• Next by thread: MP-BIOS bug: 8254 timer not connected to IO-APIC
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]