On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 14:16:13 -0400 Vivek Goyal <[email protected]> wrote: > > Can you please have a look at the attached patch Looks like a fine patch to me, although it could benefit from a comment explaining why all those PAGE_ALIGN()s are in there. > and include it in -mm. Does it fix a patch in -mm or is it needed in mainline? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 2.6.18-mm2 boot failure on x86-64
- From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.18-mm2 boot failure on x86-64
- References:
- Re: 2.6.18-mm2 boot failure on x86-64
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.18-mm2 boot failure on x86-64
- From: Steve Fox <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.18-mm2 boot failure on x86-64
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.18-mm2 boot failure on x86-64
- From: Steve Fox <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.18-mm2 boot failure on x86-64
- From: [email protected] (Mel Gorman)
- Re: 2.6.18-mm2 boot failure on x86-64
- From: Vivek Goyal <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.18-mm2 boot failure on x86-64
- From: [email protected] (Mel Gorman)
- Re: 2.6.18-mm2 boot failure on x86-64
- From: Steve Fox <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.18-mm2 boot failure on x86-64
- From: Vivek Goyal <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.18-mm2 boot failure on x86-64
- From: Mel Gorman <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.18-mm2 boot failure on x86-64
- From: Vivek Goyal <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.18-mm2 boot failure on x86-64
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] CONFIG_TELCLOCK depends on X86
- Next by Date: Re: [RFC PATCH] nForce4 ADMA with NCQ: It's aliiiive..
- Previous by thread: Re: 2.6.18-mm2 boot failure on x86-64
- Next by thread: Re: 2.6.18-mm2 boot failure on x86-64
- Index(es):
 |