RE: Fwd: [PATCH] x86_64: typo in __assign_irq_vector when update pos for vector and offset

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>So to get things going making TARGET_CPUS cpu_online_map looks like
>the right thing to do.

Yes. but need to other reference to TARGET_CPUS to verify...it doesn't
break sth.

>My question is are your io_apics pci devices?  Not does the kernel
>have them.

Yes, I'm testing with 32 amd8132 in the simulator. Or forget about about
ioapic, and use MSI, and HT-irq directly...?

>There are a lot of ways we can approach assigning irqs to cpus and
there
>is a lot of work there.  I think Adrian Bunk has been doing some work
>with the user space irq balancer, and should probably be involved.

Right. We need only do needed in kernel space, and leave most to irq
balancer.

YH





-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux