Re: [PATCH 1/2] [PCI] Check that MWI bit really did get set

Ar Sul, 2006-10-15 am 17:16 -0700, ysgrifennodd David Brownell:
> Signed-off-by: David Brownell <[email protected]>

Acked-by: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
> 
> --- a/include/linux/pci.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pci.h
> @@ -499,7 +499,7 @@ int __must_check pci_enable_device_bars(
>  void pci_disable_device(struct pci_dev *dev);
>  void pci_set_master(struct pci_dev *dev);
>  #define HAVE_PCI_SET_MWI
> -int __must_check pci_set_mwi(struct pci_dev *dev);
> +int pci_set_mwi(struct pci_dev *dev);
>  void pci_clear_mwi(struct pci_dev *dev);
>  void pci_intx(struct pci_dev *dev, int enable);
>  int pci_set_dma_mask(struct pci_dev *dev, u64 mask);
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH 1/2] [PCI] Check that MWI bit really did get set
    • From: Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 1/2] [PCI] Check that MWI bit really did get set
    • From: David Brownell <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 1/2] [PCI] Check that MWI bit really did get set
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 1/2] [PCI] Check that MWI bit really did get set
    • From: David Brownell <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/2] [PCI] Check that MWI bit really did get set
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/2] [PCI] Check that MWI bit really did get set
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/2] [PCI] Check that MWI bit really did get set
• Next by thread: Re: [Bulk] Re: [PATCH 1/2] [PCI] Check that MWI bit really did get set
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]