On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 12:51:48AM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 01:34:13AM +0200, Marcel Holtmann wrote:
> > Hi Al,
> >
> > > <= and => don't work well on net-endian...
> >
> > can we have a clean one for the BNEP part. Not one that changes
> > something and then another one reverting it.
>
> *shrug*
>
> I can reorder, of course. FWIW, I prefer to do a patch that annotates
> existing use and provably does not change behaviour + fixes for whatever
> crap shows up once said existing use is annotated, but if you prefer it
> in opposite order...
>
> OTOH, in this case bug is obvious enough as it is, so... Will reorder
> and send.
Done.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
