On Thursday 12 October 2006 17:26, Lee Revell wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-10-12 at 13:56 -0700, Open Source wrote:
> > Yes, I am pretty sure you are right about the timing. But it shouldn't be that way. If it is, then there's a bug.
> >
> > I'm fully willing to accept there is something else I should be doing driver-wise, but it shoudn't require recompiling the stock distribution kernels. Otherwise, Linux is not competitive with Microsoft Windows in this regard!
> >
> > I'll try a recompile and report back. In the meantime, if anyone else has any ideas, please let me know!
> >
>
> Yes, I agree that it would be a bug. If it turns out to be related to
> CONFIG_HZ, ask your distro why they rolled it back from 1000 to 250Hz.
If this turns out to be tied to the HZ rate its a bug. It _should_ not be using
this timing to do this ergo bug. You may be able to bypass by using 1000Hz
but this is not a fix...
Ed Tomlinson
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
