Re: [PATCH 10 of 23] Unionfs: Inode operations

On 10/7/06, Josef Jeff Sipek <[email protected]> wrote:

+static int unionfs_setattr(struct dentry *dentry, struct iattr *ia)
+{

[snip]

+       for (bindex = bstart; (bindex <= bend) || (bindex == bstart); bindex++) {

But everywhere else we have

       for (bindex = bstart; bindex <= bend; bindex++) {

Hmm?

P.S. for_each_branch() and for_each_branch_reverse() might be a good idea.

                                      Pekka
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH 0 of 23] Unionfs: Stackable Namespace Unification Filesystem
    • From: Josef "Jeff" Sipek <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH 10 of 23] Unionfs: Inode operations
    • From: Josef "Jeff" Sipek <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Hardware bug or kernel bug?
• Next by Date: Re: Machine reboot
• Previous by thread: [PATCH 10 of 23] Unionfs: Inode operations
• Next by thread: [PATCH 19 of 23] Unionfs: Helper macros/inlines
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]