Re: [PATCH] Redefine instances of sema_init() to use standard form.

Hi,

On Thursday 12 October 2006 09:44, Robert P. J. Day wrote:

> Since there seems to be no compelling reason *not* to do this, 
[..]
> -	/*
> -	 * Logically,
> -	 *   *sem = (struct semaphore)__SEMAPHORE_INITIALIZER((*sem),val);
> -	 * except that gcc produces better initializing by parts yet.
> -	 */

You've seen this?

bye, Roman
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Redefine instances of sema_init() to use standard form.
  - From: "Robert P. J. Day" <[email protected]>

References:
- [PATCH] Redefine instances of sema_init() to use standard form.
  - From: "Robert P. J. Day" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] sk98lin: handle pci_enable_device() return value in skge_resume() properly
Next by Date: Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 0/5] Allow more than PAGESIZE data read in configfs
Previous by thread: [PATCH] Redefine instances of sema_init() to use standard form.
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Redefine instances of sema_init() to use standard form.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]