Re: [patch 2/5] mm: fault vs invalidate/truncate race fix

[Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>]

On Thu, 12 Oct 2006, Nick Piggin wrote:
> 
> > Are you saying that something like this would be preferable?
> 
> I think so, it is neater and clearer. I actually didn't even bother relocking
> and checking the page again on readpage error so got rid of quite a bit of
> code.

Well, the readpage error should be rare (and for the _normal_ case we just 
do the "wait_on_page_locked()" thing). And I think we should lock the page 
in order to do the truncation check, no?

But I don't have any really strong feelings. I'm certainly ok with the 
patch I sent out. How about putting it through -mm? Here's my sign-off:

	Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>

if you want to send it off to Andrew (or if Andrew wants to just take it 
himself ;)

Btw, how did you even notice this? Just by reading the source, or because 
you actually saw multiple errors reported?

		Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/