Re: [PATCH] block layer: ioprio_best function fix

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Oct 12 2006, Vasily Tarasov wrote:
> Currently ioprio_best function first checks wethere aioprio or bioprio equals
> IOPRIO_CLASS_NONE (ioprio_valid() macros does that) and if it is so it returns
> bioprio/aioprio appropriately. Thus the next four lines, that set aclass/bclass
> to IOPRIO_CLASS_BE, if aclass/bclass == IOPRIO_CLASS_NONE, are never executed.
> 
> The second problem: if aioprio from class IOPRIO_CLASS_NONE and bioprio from
> class IOPRIO_CLASS_IDLE are passed to ioprio_best function, it will return
> IOPRIO_CLASS_IDLE. It means that during __make_request we can merge two
> requests and set the priority of merged request to IDLE, while one of
> the initial requests originates from a process with NONE (default) priority.
> So we can get a situation when a process with default ioprio will experience
> IO starvation, while there is no process from real-time class in the system.
> 
> Just removing ioprio_valid check should correct situation.

Analysis looks correct, thanks.

-- 
Jens Axboe

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux