> I agree. You are trying to use configfs for something that it is not
> entended to be used for.
Yup - but perhaps the best answer is that the design should be
extended, to handle a simple vector, such as a list of task process
id's or a list of CPU numbers.
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <[email protected]> 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [PATCH 0/5] Allow more than PAGESIZE data read in configfs
- From: Chandra Seetharaman <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/5] Allow more than PAGESIZE data read in configfs
- From: Joel Becker <[email protected]>
- Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 0/5] Allow more than PAGESIZE data read in configfs
- From: "Paul Menage" <[email protected]>
- Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 0/5] Allow more than PAGESIZE data read in configfs
- From: Joel Becker <[email protected]>
- Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 0/5] Allow more than PAGESIZE data read in configfs
- From: Matt Helsley <[email protected]>
- Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 0/5] Allow more than PAGESIZE data read in configfs
- From: Joel Becker <[email protected]>
- Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 0/5] Allow more than PAGESIZE data read in configfs
- From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
- Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 0/5] Allow more than PAGESIZE data read in configfs
- From: Chandra Seetharaman <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 0/5] Allow more than PAGESIZE data read in configfs
- Prev by Date: Re: [patch 00/67] 2.6.18-stable review
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/9] i386-pda: Updated i386 PDA patches against 2.6.19-rc1-mm1
- Previous by thread: Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 0/5] Allow more than PAGESIZE data read in configfs
- Next by thread: Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 0/5] Allow more than PAGESIZE data read in configfs
- Index(es):
 |