On Wed, 2006-10-11 at 15:48 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Oct 2006 15:18:22 -0700
> Joel Becker <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 01:19:35PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > The patch deletes a pile of custom code from configfs and replaces it with
> > > calls to standard kernel infrastructure and fixes a shortcoming/bug in the
> > > process. Migration over to the new interface is trivial and almost
> > > scriptable.
> >
> > The configfs stuff is based on the sysfs code too. Should we
> > migrate sysfs/file.c to the same seq_file code? Serious question, if
> > the cleanup is considered better.
> >
>
> I don't see why not. I don't know if anyone has though of/proposed it
> before.
I can generate a patch for that too.
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Chandra Seetharaman | Be careful what you choose....
- [email protected] | .......you may get it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
