Re: [PATCH 2/2] m68k: more workarounds for recent binutils idiocy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 11:30:05PM +0200, Roman Zippel wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Wed, 11 Oct 2006, Al Viro wrote:
> 
> > cretinous thing doesn't believe that (%a0)+ is one macro argument and
> > splits it in two; worked around by quoting the argument...
> 
> NAK, this is a bug in binutils and is fixed there already (at least in 
> CVS).

OK...  Would be nice to find out which versions are broken (that's
Documentation/Changes fodder), I'll see to it.

What about the first problem?  Even current binutils CVS treats
foo.bar as a single identifier, and doesn't recognize it as invocation
of foo with .bar as the first argument.  Any objections against the
first patch?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux