Jan Engelhardt wrote:
%p will do no such thing in the kernel. As for the difference... %x
might happen to work on some architectures (where sizeof(void
*)==sizeof(int)),
but it's not portable _and_ not right. %p is proper C for that...
Ah I see your point, but then again, %lx could have been used. Unless
there is some arch where sizeof(long) != sizeof(void *).
That really makes gcc bitch, *and* it's wrong for a whole bunch of reasons.
It's really too bad gcc bitches about %#p, because that's arguably The Right
Thing.
ack. Make a bug report perhaps?
Maybe. They'll probably say "the C standard says so" :-/
-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
