On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 04:48:24PM +0200, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-10-08 at 11:39 +1000, Nick Piggin wrote:
> > >On Sat, 7 Oct 2006 15:06:04 +0200 (CEST)
> > >Nick Piggin <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >>Add an arch_alloc_page to match arch_free_page.
> > >>
> > >
> > >umm.. why?
> > >
> >
> > I had a future patch to more kernel_map_pages into it, but couldn't
> > decide if that's a generic kernel feature that is only implemented in
> > 2 architectures, or an architecture speicifc feature. So I left it out.
> >
> > But at least Martin wanted a hook here for his volatile pages patches,
> > so I thought I'd submit this patch anyway.
>
> With Nicks patch I can use arch_alloc_page instead of page_set_stable,
> but I can still not use arch_free_page instead of page_set_unused
> because it is done before the check for reserved pages. If reserved
> pages go away or the arch_free_page call would get moved after the check
> I could replace page_set_unused as well. So with Nicks patch we are only
> halfway there..
Ahh, but with my patchSET I think we are all the way there ;)
Nick
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
