David> Also, if you don't do checksumming on the card we MUST copy
David> the data (be it from a user buffer, or from a filesystem
David> page cache page) into a private buffer since if the data
David> changes the checksum would become invalid, as I mentioned
David> in another email earlier.
Yes, I get that now -- I replied to Michael's email before I read yours.
David> Therefore, since we have to copy anyways, it always is
David> better to checksum in parallel with the copy.
Yes.
David> So the whole idea of SG without hw-checksum support is
David> without much merit at all.
Well, on IB it is possible to implement a netdevice (IPoIB connected
mode, I assume that's what Michael is working on) with a large MTU
(64KB is a number thrown around, but really there's not any limit) but
no HW checksum capability. Doing that in a practical way means we
need to allow non-linear skbs to be passed in.
On the other hand I'm not sure how useful such a netdevice would be --
will non-sendfile() paths generate big packets even if the MTU is 64KB?
Maybe GSO gives us all the real advantages of this anyway?
- R.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
