Re: Potential fix for fdtable badness.

[Vadim Lobanov <vlobanov@speakeasy.net>]

On Tuesday 10 October 2006 19:31, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Oct 2006 19:08:18 -0700
>
> Vadim Lobanov <vlobanov@speakeasy.net> wrote:
> > Would you prefer me to resend a fixed patch #4, or a new fix (#5) on top
> > of what's in your tree?
>
> Incremental updates are preferred.
>
> > diff -Npru old/fs/file.c new/fs/file.c
> > --- old/fs/file.c	2006-10-10 18:58:21.000000000 -0700
> > +++ new/fs/file.c	2006-10-10 19:01:03.000000000 -0700
> > @@ -164,9 +164,8 @@ static struct fdtable * alloc_fdtable(un
> >  	 * the fdarray into page-sized chunks: starting at a quarter of a page,
> >  	 * and growing in powers of two from there on.
> >  	 */
> > -	nr++;
> >  	nr /= (PAGE_SIZE / 4 / sizeof(struct file *));
> > -	nr = roundup_pow_of_two(nr);
> > +	nr = roundup_pow_of_two(nr + 1);
> >  	nr *= (PAGE_SIZE / 4 / sizeof(struct file *));
> >  	if (nr > NR_OPEN)
> >  		nr = NR_OPEN;
>
> Like that.

I'll wrap the fixes up in incremental patches once the problem has been 
eradicated.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/