Re: faults and signals

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2006-10-10 at 04:04 +0200, Nick Piggin wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 12:00:01PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > 
> > > Yes. Tho it's also fairly easy to just add an argument to the wrapper
> > > and fix all archs... but yeah, I will play around.
> > 
> > Actually, user_mode(ptregs) is standard, we could add a ptregs arg to
> > the wrapper... or just get rid of it and fix archs, it's not like it was
> > that hard. There aren't that many callers :)
> > 
> > Is there any reason why we actually need that wrapper ?
> 
> Not much reason. If you go through and fix up all callers then
> that should be fine.

I suppose I can do that... I'll give it a go once all your new stuff is
in -mm and I've started adapting SPUfs to it :)

Ben.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux