On Mon, 9 Oct 2006 11:09:39 -0700
Misha Tomushev <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sunday 08 October 2006 12:27 am, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > > + ecmd->phy_address = 0; /* !!! Stole from e1000 */
> > > + ecmd->speed = 3; /* !!! Stole from e1000 */
> >
> > Eh?
> You are right. Will fix.
> >
> > > +static void vnic_get_regs(struct net_device *netdev,
> > > + struct ethtool_regs *regs, void *p)
> > > +{
> > > + struct vnic_device *vnicdev = netdev->priv;
> > > + struct vioc_device *viocdev = vnicdev->viocdev;
> > > + char *regs_buff = p;
> > > +
> > > + memset(regs_buff, 0, VNIC_REGS_CNT * VNIC_REGS_LINE_LEN);
> > > +
> > > + regs->version = 1;
> > > +
> > > + sprintf(regs_buff, "%08Lx = %08x\n",
> > > + GETRELADDR(VREG_BMC_GLOBAL, VIOC_BMC, 0),
> > > + VIOC_READ_REG(VREG_BMC_GLOBAL, VIOC_BMC, 0, viocdev));
> > > + regs_buff += strlen(regs_buff);
> > > +
> > > + sprintf(regs_buff, "%08Lx = %08x\n",
> > > + GETRELADDR(VREG_BMC_DEBUG, VIOC_BMC, 0),
> > > + VIOC_READ_REG(VREG_BMC_DEBUG, VIOC_BMC, 0, viocdev));
> > > + regs_buff += strlen(regs_buff);
> > > +
> > > + sprintf(regs_buff, "%08Lx = %08x\n",
> > > + GETRELADDR(VREG_BMC_DEBUGPRIV, VIOC_BMC, 0),
> > > + VIOC_READ_REG(VREG_BMC_DEBUGPRIV, VIOC_BMC, 0, viocdev));
> > > + regs_buff += strlen(regs_buff);
> > > +
> > > + sprintf(regs_buff, "%08Lx = %08x\n",
> > > + GETRELADDR(VREG_BMC_FABRIC, VIOC_BMC, 0),
> > > + VIOC_READ_REG(VREG_BMC_FABRIC, VIOC_BMC, 0, viocdev));
> > > + regs_buff += strlen(regs_buff);
> > > +
> > > + sprintf(regs_buff, "%08Lx = %08x\n",
> > > + GETRELADDR(VREG_BMC_VNIC_EN, VIOC_BMC, 0),
> > > + VIOC_READ_REG(VREG_BMC_VNIC_EN, VIOC_BMC, 0, viocdev));
> > > + regs_buff += strlen(regs_buff);
> > > +
> > > + sprintf(regs_buff, "%08Lx = %08x\n",
> > > + GETRELADDR(VREG_BMC_PORT_EN, VIOC_BMC, 0),
> > > + VIOC_READ_REG(VREG_BMC_PORT_EN, VIOC_BMC, 0, viocdev));
> > > + regs_buff += strlen(regs_buff);
> > > +
> > > + sprintf(regs_buff, "%08Lx = %08x\n",
> > > + GETRELADDR(VREG_BMC_VNIC_CFG, VIOC_BMC, 0),
> > > + VIOC_READ_REG(VREG_BMC_VNIC_CFG, VIOC_BMC, 0, viocdev));
> > > + regs_buff += strlen(regs_buff);
> > > +
> > > + sprintf(regs_buff, "%08Lx = %08x\n",
> > > + GETRELADDR(VREG_IHCU_RXDQEN, VIOC_IHCU, 0),
> > > + VIOC_READ_REG(VREG_IHCU_RXDQEN, VIOC_IHCU, 0, viocdev));
> > > + regs_buff += strlen(regs_buff);
> > > +
> > > + sprintf(regs_buff, "%08Lx = %08x\n",
> > > + GETRELADDR(VREG_VENG_VLANTAG, VIOC_VENG, vnicdev->vnic_id),
> > > + VIOC_READ_REG(VREG_VENG_VLANTAG, VIOC_VENG, vnicdev->vnic_id,
> > > + viocdev));
> > > + regs_buff += strlen(regs_buff);
> > > +
> > > + sprintf(regs_buff, "%08Lx = %08x\n",
> > > + GETRELADDR(VREG_VENG_TXD_CTL, VIOC_VENG, vnicdev->vnic_id),
> > > + VIOC_READ_REG(VREG_VENG_TXD_CTL, VIOC_VENG, vnicdev->vnic_id,
> > > + viocdev));
> > > + regs_buff += strlen(regs_buff);
> > > +
> > > +}
> >
> > This looks ugly. What interface is that?
> This is the interface between the driver and ethtool.
> Using the text buffer is one way to keep changed limited to one side (driver). Ultimately, I think that this ethtool function (dumping hw registers) should become more generic,
> as opposed to what it is now - unique for every individual driver.
> > Pavel
>
Please just dump binary like other drivers. The code for ethtool allows per device
decode. Move the decode to there.
Yes, ethtool source does need a more generic register description language.
--
Stephen Hemminger <[email protected]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
