Re: [PATCH] Try to avoid a pessimistic vmalloc() recursion

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Eric Dumazet wrote:
__vmalloc_area_node() is a litle bit pessimist when allocating space for storing struct page pointers.

When allocating more than 4 MB on ia32, or 2 MB on x86_64, __vmalloc_area_node() has to allocate more than PAGE_SIZE bytes to store pointers to page structs. This means that two TLB translations are needed to access data.

This patch tries a kmalloc() call, then only if this first attempt failed, a vmalloc() is performed. (Later, at vfree() time we chose kfree() or vfree() with a test on flags & VM_VPAGES : no change is needed)
Most of the time, the first kmalloc() should be OK, so we reduce TLB usage.

But this is only TLB usage when managing (read: freeing) the vmalloc pages,
isn't it? Not when actually accessing the data.

I'd be inclined to NACK this, unless you can show an improvement somewhere:
it is suboptimal to even _try_ allocating higher order pages.

--
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com -
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux